Wednesday, December 11, 2019
Internet voting Essay Example For Students
 Internet voting Essay  Voting is defined as expressing the will or a preference in a matter by ballot,  voice, etc (Grolier 1). Voting on the Internet has become a major issue in the past  couple years. Their are many different groups who have very diverse opinions on  the role the Internet should play in the 2000 elections. The myriad types of on-line  voting systems proposed for use has resulted in many heated arguments in the world  of politics. Adversarys of voting on the Internet state, It would not be legally,  practically or fiscally feasible to develop a comprehensive remote Internet voting Essay  system (Phillips 3).   However advocates of on-line voting argue, There is nothing  inherently more mischievous about Internet voting than paper ballots (Wayne 1).  Before a person can decide what side of the Internet voting debate they want to  support, they must be made aware of the issues at hand.  One method of on-line voting is The Polling Place System. This is generally  considered to be the most tamper proof system available to the public. The Polling  Place System is run a lot like the traditional paper ballot voting structure election  officials have used for many years (Phillips 2). The voters go to a designated voting  station and cast their votes using computers provided by the Federal Election  Commission, or FEC (Wayne 1).         The election is under the control of election  officials at all times which allows for uniformity of communication privacy and  security protocols. Perhaps the greatest advantage to this system is the ability to  provide paper audit trails and additional identity verification (Phillips 2). The  capability to have a paper record of the ballots cast by each indiviual voter is what  makes this system the most tamper proof available.  The other process of Internet voting is called the Remote System. It is  believed that this system will result in a, boost in voter turn out which is now at  historic lows(Phillips 2). This belief is a result of how accessible this system will  make voting.   The voter is responsible for providing the computer unlike the Polling  Place System. This allows the voter to cast their vote anywhere as long as they have  access to the Internet. However, the downfall of this system is the lack of paper audit  trails (Wayne 3). This in turn causes a lack of regulation in not only the ability to  track individual ballots but the uniformity of voting conditions (Phillips 3).  There are many advantages to voting on the Internet. One of the most  evident advantages is that it is cost effective.   It virtually eliminates any need for the  current election provided equipment and the thousands of people working in the  voting booths (Popkin 17). The freedom voters will have to vote from any location  will eliminate the need for specific voting ballots (Phillips 2). This freedom will also  make voting more convenient and will probably boost voter turn out. It will allow  for a greater participation in voting from groups like business executives, overseas  military and young people. These three groups generally have a low voter turn out  but have readily access to the Internet (Wayne 2). This ability to access the Internet  on a regular basis is what is believed will raise their voter participation.   On-line  voting will also eradicate the need for pole workers (Phillips 2). This work would be  handled by a small group of people working for the election vendor, the Internet site  On-line voting also has many disadvantages when compared to the  traditional paper ballot system (Popkin 13). At this time there are no standards in  place for the election vendors. The lack regulations and uniformity can result in  many different ballot outcomes (Wayne 1). Other worries are that hackers may  infiltrate the computer voting system and manipulate the results. It is feared that a  hacker could implant a virus in the computers of the voters and substitute his own  vote for thousands of legitimate votes.   .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a , .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .postImageUrl , .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a , .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a:hover , .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a:visited , .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a:active { border:0!important; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a:active , .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative   ; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left   : 18px; top: 0; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u8cb93d3c0f4fbc27b85d25978412b68a:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Using the Science of Life As A Weapon Persuasive Essay This type of fraud would make prosecution  extremely difficult since there would no longer be physical evidence, like on paper  ballots, to prove such fraud (Phillips 4).  There are many different issues in debate over the topic of Internet voting. It  is the duty of every U.S. citizen .    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.